B56
A young person should not make it a criterion in his/her choice of a spouse, of how romantic the ‘candidate’/person in consideration is.
(Acting ‘romantic’ is different from being sensitive, capable of tenderness, affection and being sympathetic. It is even different from appreciating the romance in certain novels or philosophies).
Mostly it is women who discriminate in favour of a candidate who acts romantic.
B57
Similarly, one should not make it a criterion of how ‘bright’ (in demeanour/disposition), cheerful and smiling OR ‘smart’ a candidate is.
(Nowadays, both men and women discriminate in favour of that).
‘Smart’ in the above sentence does not mean ‘intelligent’, unlike the common usage in American speech.
There should be no discrimination against a person who is introvert or quiet.
It is the character and culture of the candidate that should matter.
Also intelligence.
___
In this context, it might be pertinent to mention the following quotes :
There is a melancholy that only affects noble souls.
-?
(I guess because the world in which they find themselves is a very imperfect one)
Sometimes, if the world doesn’t drive you mad, you were not sane to begin with.
-an Arabic saying
In an episode of the podcast ‘Joe Rogan Experience’ (YouTube), he had said words to the effect that intelligent people are more likely to go through depression sometime or the other in their lives.
Depression is a natural response to an unnatural environment.
-Johann Hari?
(-or quoted in the comments section of a YouTube video)
(Alluding to the paucity of the human and the natural touch, in urban life today).
[Note : Of course it is not the only response possible. In this sentence depression need not mean the clinical diagnosis or the technical term in Psychology; it may mean a feeling of ‘blues’ or some thoughts acting against mental well-being].
Before diagnosing yourself as depressed, please verify that everyone around you is not of an odious character.
(The last term substituted for propriety).
___
Someone with idealism or imagination in them, would – on occasions – feel the difference between her/his concept of the right and what she/he sees in her/his real-world surroundings.
The point is, to not let that distress oneself. Not to think about it at all, unless it be to change it.
Interestingly, the above kind of persons are also the ones who are often truly happy. Perhaps more than- or unlike- the persons to whom only ‘net worth’, power and hedonistic pleasures really matter.
It’s just that in many cases, the real world environs tend to impinge upon their consciousness.
Certainly, good-natured, gentle, cultured or principled persons would have more adversities – if only at a psychological level – thrown at them, in life. Dear reader, imagine how unjust it is to discriminate against such persons, rather than appreciating their good qualities, showing solidarity, and wishing for a better world.
___
[Clarification : Let no one think that a dour or sullen disposition is by itself, a proof of any positive quality in the person.
Though persons having it, may be genuinely ‘misguided’ or going through issues, and deserving of our support].
___
B58
A person should always try to be-, try consciously and reasonably to be bright, happy, optimistic, smiling and laughing. (As appropriate). The belief in being happy, and the attempt to be happy, and not indulging ever the slightest in self-pity or gloomy or despondent thoughts. Feeling melancholy once in a while in life, may be natural; but one should never indulge it or give in to it.
One should be indifferent to negative and unproductive thoughts.
One should just continue life in a positive way.
___
Especially when with his/her family-members, including spouse, a person should push aside any stress or vague ‘blues’ or personal issues he/she may be having. He/she should be his/her best self, for the sake of his/her near and dear ones, and for one’s own sake.
Be in good spirits, cheerful.
(-Even if your friends or your friend/acquaintance who may one day become your spouse is right-minded and would not discriminate against you for your sombre mood).
___
B59
A young woman should not choose as spouse a man she perceives to be ‘lesser’ (relative to herself).
-In appearance, intelligence, personality or culture.
– Because she thinks that in such a case, he would always treasure her and treat her in a special way (because ‘he knows she is more than he deserves’). –He would give her more attention than what other men, with better qualities, would. This is a self-serving and self-centred conduct. In many cases, it is done because it stokes the ego of the young woman.
Also – with respect and gentleness – if a woman herself does not happen to have true culture in her, and a commitment to an elevated/idealistic way of life, a conscious principle, then it is difficult and in a way pointless for her to cultivate and maintain a relationship with a cultured and emotionally and morally good person.
May be she genuinely can’t relate to such a man, can’t ‘understand the language’..so to speak. And she does not understand the need to try.
But this should change.
___
[Although – speaking with all respect – even in such cases, the choice of the young women is mostly a man who is sufficiently worldly-wise/‘clever’ and has a large enough income. This is not an incrimination, but an attempt to make a person aware of certain erroneous or wrong choices or the want of the right thinking].
One should remember the principle – recognize, love and reward good qualities. –Not just anyone who seems to ‘value’ you.
According to the observations of this author, the kind of conduct described in this section is common.
___
B60
With all respect: Young women should remember that a young man who has some good qualities like learning or a healthy interest in it, culture or an interest in it, innocence (not the same as ignorance), satisfactory morality, sincerity in studies and profession, -would also have a sense of ‘just’ and ‘unjust’; incongruous and appropriate; merits/worth and ‘the want of it’. He would have a sense of self respect, and in a sense, ‘a sense of his own worth’ (which does not clash at all with his respecting and empathizing with others, his humility and heartfelt politeness. It is a simple matter of intelligence).
She should not expect him to fawn upon or give great importance (unrelated to the qualities in the particular young lady) to her. That should not be the mentality of any person, whether man or woman).
Such a man would not ‘pursue’ her tenaciously, approach her repeatedly (as proof of his loyalty and intensity of commitment) despite her rebuffs or offensive/un-civil disregard, refusal to seriously think upon it or ‘find out more’.
There is a proper, responsible and dignified way of declining the ‘proposal’ of- or ‘expression of interest’ from a gentleman.
Also, a first approach, and a subsequent reminder or ‘repeat expression’ from a young gentleman may elicit a ‘No’ (like ‘That is nice of you, but I cannot think in such terms’ OR ‘Your interest in/good estimation of me is appreciable, but for certain personal reasons, I cannot go ahead’). But then it should not happen like another young man makes 3 or 5 approaches, just sticks to it and makes an intensive show of niceness and ‘love’, and the lady eventually consents. –kind of eases into the arrangement. Such a young lady – with all respect, and this is not meant in a prurient way – is almost certainly not thinking of principles or good thoughts or good qualities, in this matter.
In fact, in most cases, sticking to ‘pursuing’ a particular young woman, despite two or more unfavourable responses, possibly signifies some ‘base’ or wrong quality in the young man concerned. –(Said with all respect and goodwill for the man). It should not be counted as a positive indicator by women.
However, two approaches (to a given person), made over an appropriate interval of time, seems alright, possibly desirable. In some cases (rarely I guess), more than two may be alright.
___
B61
A woman should not marry a man of clever and worldly/shrewd mindset, or one of slick character, or a ‘tough-acting’, loud-mouth, brash character, or a man of ‘base masculine’ personality, thinking that life as the wife of such a man would be easier. (Which it probably would).
__
B72
Some persons – as a happy fact – naturally have the right mentality, the good disposition regarding choosing a spouse. So such women choose the right kind of men. But – with all respect and love, with only good intentions – let it be said, that a very large section of women do not. Let it be humbly stated : the only assured way, the only truly effective way of ensuring that a young woman chooses the right spouse is – education (this is ‘true education’, having little or nothing to do with schooling)(it includes cultivation/development of culture)(of course self-education or realization is the best. But if for some reason, it does not occur –which is not necessarily to the discredit of the person concerned -then some ‘suggestions’ from the ‘environment’ of the person, presentation of right and good ideas, exhortation is also perfectly alright and desirable).
Of course, the same applies for young men.
___
The above has to start from childhood. And prominently, from teenage. The parents can’t wake up one day when their daughter or son is 19 or 22 and decide now they are going to try and inculcate the relevant good qualities in their ward. It should be obvious that in most cases, the cause is by then a lost cause. Or would be unmanageably difficult.
The reader may refer to the Paper Child Development for substantive ideas on good upbringing and education of children. They have been framed to the best of the (limited) knowledge and understanding of the author.
___
Similarly, sympathizing with a person, for some reason, is a humane and good thing, but that by itself, probably should not be a criterion in choosing one’s spouse. One should continue to be friends with him/her, and help.
___
E1
On how to make oneself more eligible, -a better person to marry –
One should not think too much about one’s appearance, or the impression he/she would be creating with this sentence or that, with this dress and body language or that.
Rather, one should think : I am going to think and do the right thing, the good thing.
That is it.
The others may then understand you, come round to your right way (as they should) or not. If they are of the mentality that they do not, then may be you are not going to have a successful married life with them anyway.
Important: Many a times, you can and you should explain to the candidate or his/her family why you have an uncommon view or conduct, related to something. Say it in an unpretentious, plain way; but also in an ‘open’ way. That is, you are not this close-minded ideologue. What you have is convictions. Say it; don’t keep quiet and assume they would understand; or lose out on a good candidate and then feel aggrieved about ‘the society’ or fate.
Though in some cases, one needs to combine one’s ideal mentality with some practical methods too, for an ultimate good goal. (By yourself you would have always done the ideal thing, but it is your environment that is obliging you to adopt some practical method).
The right kind of pragmatism is an instrument in serving the ideal dream.
However, in what cases and in what proportion such practical ideas should be applied, is perhaps a ‘judgment call’. At present, this author does not have enough time to think and consult on it. May be sometime else. And anyway, the person concerned should take responsibility and try to find out himself/herself.
___
E2
If a young man or woman is cultured and principled,
If he/she is well-read and has worthy ‘hobbies’, engagements,
If he/she has a high goal and is working hard to achieve it, then –
He/she would gather confidence, and also would be attractive to other young people.
Being eligible or desirable (in a good sense), is something that is not so much ‘achieved by deliberate efforts’, but is a ‘by-product’ or sign of what a person fundamentally is. His/her actual beliefs and way of life.
Being genuine and being one’s true self is essential. But for your own sake, for your parents’ sake and for the sake of the principle itself, one should be a better person. –Not for the sake of ‘getting a fine/good-looking spouse’.
In one American internet video, I heard the lines –“Being yourself does not imply you should retain your present flaws. Rather, you should be the best version of yourself, the best that you can be.”
___
B64
You should marry the right person.. even if then you would have to live in separate cities. -Due to respective career reasons. Even if that is likely to happen for most of your working life, and the children would grow up with only one parent, most of the times.
(Of course, either of you should keep trying for a posting in the same city or a job in another company in the same city. The current employers should go out of their way to accommodate that).
That is incomparably better than marrying a person of less qualities or a less good kind of a person. –Though it is less than ideal for the children (growing up with one parent), and may be some special steps/actions should be taken to make it better for the children.
You must marry a good human being. Not a city or a job or an income.
B65
It is a big mistake to think that ‘all men (or all women) are more or less the same (so I may marry whomever). The one guaranteed thing in my life is or should be my income, nice job, continuing to live in my home city or an exciting big city’.
In this context : Not only should we have the mindset to choose the right candidate, we should also be a right candidate for someone to choose. The two are part of the same mentality.
As we know, for a given qualification, it is generally easier to get an acceptable job in a big city rather than in a small one. So after marriage, a small city man or woman would probably find a job in the large city of his/her spouse, but not vice versa.
Still, if a person happens to be the resident of a small city and is himself/herself a good person, then a large city resident should marry the small city candidate all the same. Although they may not get to live under the same roof all the time.
[ Should a woman give greater priority to her job, making her professional interest the ‘constant’, -the uncompromisable requirement, and adjust with the nature or quality of the husband?
Or should she accord greater priority to marriage with a good person, or a better person, having her children with such a person, and adjust with her professional interests?
This Paper thinks that the principle that is right here is that one should consider as far more important, -important at a different level , the necessity/desirability of marrying a good, cultured and honourable person than a large income for oneself. (–Even at the cost of running the risk of feeling a bit insecure in one’s married life. This ‘cost’ would not need to be borne anyway, because a good-hearted, gentlemanly person would –by definition – never make his wife feel ‘the lesser’ or offended. Now if still the wife has an insecurity, then unfortunately it is her mistake; -unnecessary. She should rather have/awaken her good sense. -be sensible)). If the husband is gentlemanly that is ].
___
B66
One should not forego marriage to a gentleman and a man of qualities, only because he lives in a ‘far-off’ city. -Thinking that marrying a man from your own city would be the practical thing to do. This is massively wrong. I cannot understand this mentality. –And in this age of transport and communication, too.
___
B57
If a man or woman is a bit ‘lost in his/her own world’, for that reason, he should not be discriminated against as a matrimonial candidate.
At the same time, the young man or woman in question should not be ‘lost in his/her own world’ in the company of persons who are potential life partners. Or generally, in the company of youth of his/her own age group. (–at least most of the times). He/she should be ‘present’, in good spirits, attentive and communicative. In a natural and good way.
___
B62
Unfortunately, as real world observations show, respectfully speaking, many women derive a kind of ‘comfort’ or ‘assurance’ or ‘satisfaction’ from pairing up with a person who is her ‘compliment’..i.e. ‘masculine’ as opposed to her ‘feminine’. Rugged or ‘rough’ as opposed to her delicate or refined.
-In terms of appearance and personality.
___
B63
Corresponding mentalities –similar to the ones stated above – in men should also be watched out for. He should not choose a lady for the reason that she has a feminine or sweet seeming, frequently smiling, outgoing manners and personality, over ladies who are perhaps a little ‘serious’, reserved or thoughtful. Or awkward, diffident.
___
A person (gentleman or lady) should monitor or check himself/herself from time to time, on relevant occasions, to ensure that in prospecting for a spouse, he/she is not making appearance a criterion or factor in his/her decision or actions.
-Whether it be facial features, or certain facial expressions, smile.
[Though some facial expressions, the look in a person’s eyes, may indicate kindness or goodness. -which are of course truly desirable qualities. It is left to the reader to verify, be sure about whether certain ‘appearances’ in a person actually are manifestations of truly good qualities in his/her mind. For now, this author has nothing to say on this.
However, to ascertain the presence of such qualities, there are other, probably more reliable indicators. -Conduct, ‘gestures’ and manners (towards others, not only toward the ‘candidate’ himself/herself), references (citing objective reasons) from reliable persons, antecedents etc. are such indicators]. [Though gestures and manners (indicating graciousness or amicableness) may quite possibly be affected i.e. faked for the duration of a meet].
(Contd.) ‘Why am I thinking about a certain lady the way I am? Is it solely or mostly because of her appearance? Is it dependent on the appearance? Should I think about some other persons in my circle of friends or familiar faces? –based on good qualities which they may have? Shouldn’t I try to find out more about all such persons (-with whom I am technically compatible)?
Many women give importance to appearance in a man, but I guess men do the corresponding much more. Often in a circle of friends or acquaintances, they genuinely do not notice a lady of ‘plain’ or ‘inconspicuous’ appearance and manners. It genuinely does not occur to them (and to some others, it may occur, but they ignore the thought) to consider such a person as a potential spouse. -By thinking about, trying to find out whether she has the true positive qualities in her, pertinent to matrimony.
-Although he may have no conscious callousness toward her; he may even help her out as needed.
Anyway, one should rectify this kind of a psyche, or nurture the right mentality in himself.
PRACTICAL NOTE : Young men should be careful. They should think in a balanced way. Meaning, just because a young woman has a ‘plain appearance’, doesn’t mean that her mindset would be reasonable, sympathetic, moral or simple.
Conversely, a beautiful woman may be genuinely having the above good qualities.
It is not an article of faith to avoid or be especially sceptical of good-looking persons (from the conventional point of view), as potential spouse.
___
B64
A woman must marry as innocent a person as possible.
-No matter how practically disadvantageous it may be.
The corresponding applies for men.
___
A2c
A person should not marry a candidate who does not have honesty (-in a serious way).
[ Note : Coming to office late by 10-15 minutes routinely, but avoidably, is generally not serious unethical conduct ].
OR
A2d
-A person who has rudeness or callousness in him.
(Though a man would not be rude or callous to the candidate lady. –at least not before marriage).
B67
A woman should marry a boring (-if necessary), but gentlemanly person.
-Rather than a flashy, ‘stylish’ or ‘smart’ kind of a person . -But who does not have true culture in him.
Unfortunately such qualities as mentioned in this section have been common in persons in humankind. One should be alert about them. So that one is able to successfully spot them. -Including the parents.
___
B68
She must not consider it as an unfavorable factor, if the man happens to have an income less than her own.
But as stated before, one should keep in mind that the difference in intelligence should not be too great.
___
B69
This is a very important thing: As a matter of fact, if a woman or man is choosing the wrong spouse, then he/she is –in effect – letting down his/her society and the circle of good people, weakening them. It is an appeal : you should stand up and do the right thing. No matter how boring or ‘exacting’ it may seem initially.
One should have allegiance and solidarity toward his/her ‘moral and cultured, gentry class group’ and also – generally – toward his/her ‘society’.
Because these have some good and unique qualities in them, whose perpetuation and protection are ESSENTIAL.
___
This may seem repetitive; and I wish this Paper weren’t a tiresome read, and I have tried for that. Still, the contents are of the utmost importance, so I wish a reader would be understanding of that.
B70
To sum up, what kind of a man or woman should one marry? Well, the kind of a person with whom the most important, the one essential purpose of a marriage would be best served.
Someone who –among this particular person’s all realistic/available options – has the best character.
A person with whom having children with good qualities, and giving them a good upbringing, has the highest probability, among all the available or likely options.
An indicator of that is to imagine the person one is considering (the ‘candidate’), -bringing up the children (their children together) by himself/herself, as a single parent. How good and caring an upbringing would he/she be able to provide in that case?
Other considerations come latter and far after.
___
B71
If the mentality of both the spouses in a marriage is right, then all the important objectives of a marriage can and will be achieved easily, effortlessly.
The marriage would be satisfactory.
___
B73
A ‘Self affected marriage’ (commonly called ‘love marriage’)
An Arranged marriage, and
A Self-arranged marriage (kind of intermediate, when the young man and/or woman looks up for the right match on a matrimonial website/newspaper column/agency etc., himself/herself).
-Are all good and worthy of approval, if the two persons involved are of the right mentality and character. And also, if that particular marriage fulfills, satisfies the conditions and principles stated in Section B29.
___
B74
The age difference between the potential spouses does not matter much. –Provided that the particular envisioned marriage would be able to fulfill the essential requirements of a marriage (primarily ‘starting a family’, and mentally and physically healthy children), with reasonable certainty.
For certain reasons, it is desirable that the age difference be not more than 10 years. –though in exceptional cases, it can be a little more.
Due to practical reasons, it is desirable that the age difference be in the way of the husband being older than the wife, generally. –Though if the wife is up to 3-5 years older than the husband, probably it should not be a problem.
___
E3
While prospecting (i.e. searching for a spouse) how should a person himself/herself be :
(Not necessarily in order)
- Maintain good health and physical fitness.
The reader would find practically useful material on this in the page ‘Education – Health’, e.g. BMI, other concepts.
2. One should walk upright, shoulders squared (not drooping); maintain good posture.
Be a gentleman / lady. (-And not merely ‘act like it’ for expediency).
Should be civil (that goes with being gentlemanly). Yet should be upright and firm in virtue. – not accepting or going along with anything seriously wrong or unfair (remember the precept in Section E1: In some cases, if necessary for a greater or ultimate good goal, one has to combine one’s idealism with pragmatism; so in minor matters, one may co-operate with or accept something that is not right (but don’t say that is “alright / fine”. One could say – ‘‘I would accept that, though may be there are some issues with that/ -though I do not find myself agreeing with it’).
Be genuine. Be yourself.
3. -Be clean. Hygienic. Reasonably neat.
4. One should try to be of a pleasant disposition. -Reasonably good mood.
One should have positive and good thoughts, that would help.
Answer questions openly, honestly. Ask questions a lot (even if you are a man) be carefree and happy ‘for your spouse and for the candidate’. Even if you have genuine causes for worry currently. Remember that a truly good life partner is beyond petty or day to day worries and nagging thoughts.
Should not be stressed, sombre or grim.
And not depressed or neurotic either.
Seek professional help, talk to family-members and friends if necessary.
Anyway a right-minded and dutiful person cannot be depressed or dysfunctional, even though he may have some negative thoughts flitting across his mind now and then, or external challenges.
Should not be eccentric, at least not significantly.
(May be you can afford to be eccentric after age 50 or 60 🙂 ).
___
E4
If a seemingly good match or prospect is in the offing, try to make it work. In arranged match as well as exploring, prospecting by oneself.
Always keep in mind when and how you must be ‘practical’. Nowadays it is especially important. Also keep in mind the time-factor, the need for not wasting time or dallying. Acting with earnestness or urgency in some cases.
-That of course doesn’t mean one may not do sufficient prospecting, in matrimony. Indeed as a general rule in match-making one should always err on the side of a little more prospecting and verifying, than a little less. Whether in an arranged match (as common in India still) or a ‘self-made match’.
As a general rule, one should not settle for what seems to be a little dissatisfactory – not from the appearance or income and assets or self-entertainment/excitement point of view – but from the principles and good requirements of marriage point of view.
I came across a sentence on quora.com, which generally and cautiously speaking, seems correct to me : ‘Whenever you see one red flag (in a candidate or ‘indirectly’ from the parents etc.), exit (i.e. don’t take the risk).
Of course, the responsibility for all life decisions rests only on the reader, not on this author. I do not have sufficient time or energy to comprehensively think through all the ideas in these papers. Only the essential and ‘broad principles’ have been given a lot of thought. This author means well.
___
To a lady : It is not only the ‘candidate gentleman’ or their relatives’ interest or responsibility to find a good spouse and materialize the relationship. -Through ‘research’, questions and verifications and a solid decision-making process. -Or even that of your parents. It is yours. Of course your parents’ too.
This author deeply and lovingly believes in the traditional concept of a young lady being simple, innocent, ‘reserved’ (though well-mannered) and ‘quiet’ in matters of her match-making. (Though the same young lady may graciously and spontaneously do everything to help a person in need. –so she’s not disinterested or uninvolved/uncaring about her surrounding human beings. She has a large heart, compassion).
But for some critical practical reasons, ladies too should be deeply, completely involved and active in their match-making process. (-Speaking about arranged matches here).
___
Other points may be added in this section in the future.
___
B72
To parents : a parent should work, sincerely, with his/her all – to make his/her daughter or to contribute to the development of his/her daughter (or son) as a cultured person. i.e. Truly cultured. Being a good human being. With sensitivity, decency. Being benign to others. -And helping.
-Having high thoughts. Noble spirit.
This is the most important and an essential work /task of a parent’s life.
Parents and the society should not expect to have young women and men who make good choices of spouse, and do their duty to perpetuate their society, -who practice their culture, the ethos, values and sensitivities of their family and society, .. unless the former work –as one of the most important priorities in their lives – to ensure that self-sufficient and unshakable good culture is developed in the children.
[ The other important priority in their life is to materially provide for and protect their family and society ].
To young people : A youth is completely responsible himself/herself for the cultivation of the right qualities and maintaining the right conduct.
-Even if his/her parents (respectfully speaking), for some reason, have not
been able to provide the right guidance.
B27
NEVER AGAIN. -SHOULD BE THE MENTALITY AND GOAL
NEVER AGAIN SHOULD A MAN OR WOMAN OF OUR SOCIETY REMAIN UNMARRIED OR CHILDLESS OR MARRY THE WRONG KIND OF A PERSON. -OR MARRY OUTSIDE OUR SOCIETY OR A CLOSELY RELATED ONE
NOT ONE INSTANCE/CASE SHOULD BE THERE
[Practically, the goal should be ‘More than 95%’ or say ‘-98%’].
Of course, not through coercion or misbehavior. But through inculcation. Presentation of the right ideas. Raising/cultivation of good sense and practical awareness.
[Persons who believe in the above idea must at the same time, love and respect completely those persons who voluntarily do not have children or marry into another, non-related or ‘incompatible’ society.
But respect does not mean that one should go along with the latter’s mistaken/wrong ideas.
Let it be remembered, they are our own (apna). We should love one another. We are here to help them, serve their good (hit), if possible and necessary.
Of course, one should have all respect and goodwill, and love for all societies and communities].
___
B72b
Only when parents are sincerely trying, have made up their minds, have internally, in intent and spirit become good-natured, honest and cultured, can it be probable that the children would be so. The environment of the home should be so. Otherwise it is practically very difficult or impossible.
For the Definition of culture, the reader may refer to Paper 11 Section .
___
B75
Regarding having meets with potential spouses, to get to know him/her better–
e.g. in college or early work life i.e. as part of a self-affected marriage (commonly called ‘love marriage’) (This is not so called ‘dating’).
Approximately 3-5 meets (possibly in a café or on a walk) (some with only the two persons concerned, and some – much desirably – with a friend or two whose judgment is good)
AND
following the person on some suitable social media,
AND
‘vetting’- asking for opinions from third-part acquaintances of that person
-Should be sufficient.
If deemed worthy of advancing, the next step would be to inform respective parents/guardians, get to know the other person’s family and home better.
The only purpose of such meets should be to identify a person who is desirable as a spouse.
Let it be remembered that in an Arranged Marriage, there is much less number of meets and other interactions between the potential spouses. 3 to 5 meets even in a Self-affected or Auto-arranged Marriage should be enough to decide whether a person is acceptable or not. Plus, the candidates in a self-affected match-making, in most cases, see each other frequently in class or office.
This author doesn’t know what percentage of ‘love marriages’ have ended in divorce or serious problems for the spouse/s, and what percentage of ‘arranged marriages’ have ended in the same. -whether there are studies on this.
But he guesses strongly that the success of a marriage depends less on the number of meets in the match-making period (provided that there have been at least 2 to 3 meets) and more on the mindset of each of the two persons. As said in Section B21, if the mentality in this regard is right, the right intent (sadiccha) is there on the part of both the candidates, then marriage between any two persons in the world (they should be of the same age group and all) would be successful.
[Note : In such meets, both persons should ask explicitly and verify whether the other person is committed to practicing all the essential and important requirements of a marriage (as given in SectionB1 -B4, and B21)].
B76
If one doesn’t find someone positively satisfactory, in ‘natural meets’, i.e. presence of good qualities, not just ‘alright’ or ‘will do’/chalega then he/she should hold off marriage for an arranged match later.
___
B77
There should be no such activity as ‘dating’. -i.e. meets and interactions between two persons as a leisure activity or ‘form of entertainment’.
B56(b)
Let it be delved upon – so many ‘love marriages’ fail, end in divorce. The woman in each case must have been satisfied with the man, in many cases, if not most, she may have been made to feel ‘special’.
A lady should not expect or need anyone to make her ‘feel special’ (in the commonly used sense these days). One should be a special person, as should everyone be.
And then others would treat the former in a special way too.
There can be many special moments, and a person can feel ‘special’ (because of the loving, caring behaviour of a near and dear one) in the family circle, friends or neighbourhood, if we have such functional groups.
___
Let it be remembered, it’s often the dishonest in some respect or ‘hidden agenda’ kind of hotel or taxi or travel agency etc., that pays extra attention, is extra nice to you. In fact, impeccably, studiously honest individuals may come across at times as a bit curt, ‘hurried’, though not indifferent.
Mind, terse quality in manners, voice may also be a sign of genuine negative qualities in a person, or sub-conscious disinterest. I guess it’s kind of a judgment call. –But there are other indicators, associated qualities, which help one to determine.
___
B78
One could imagine a girl who is so good minded, -who has true culture, -whose mind is so high and noble, that things like slickness, ‘smartness’, ‘quick/savvy’ or ‘spicy’ talk, ‘style’ (in the worldly sense), ‘toughness’ and vigour, mere appearances, cleverness, shrewdness etc., have no appeal for her.
They are ‘alien’ or antithetical to her culture.
She recognizes them as negative and would avoid them, if she came across any of them.
___
And at the same time, she might be a ‘normal’ person.. smiling, down to earth, unassuming.
___
The corresponding is applicable for men.
___
B72c
The parents of a child should do everything they can to cultivate good culture and mindset in their young one.
In most matters, letting the child have the opportunity to think for himself/herself, -of doing the right thing by his/her original thought (i.e. without anyone pointing it out. -At least initially. -While ensuring that no serious irreversible damage occurs.
That means being of the right character and personality themselves (i.e. the parents themselves), being cultured/maintaining a cultured way of life (or sincerely trying) themselves; ensuring the right environment at home and elsewhere for the child. -And speaking to the child, presenting ideas, suggesting, appealing, exhorting, as and when desirable. Applying discipline as and when necessary.
(-the last does not mean smacking; that perhaps may have to be done, in some cases and rarely, say from age two to three; and only to ensure the physical safety of the child).
The child or boy/girl reading good books, periodicals etc., good films, right kind of entertainment. Providing true education, which may or may not coincide with schooling.
Maintaining the right environment means introduction (and ‘reinforcement’ or ‘reiteration’/re-introduction) of the right kind of material, and elimination/prevention of the wrong kind.
Speaking to the child. Saying good things. Telling good stories and anecdotes. Family stories.
Not always in the way of didactics or exposition (updesh); often as a good-natured or well-cultured, good-spirited general remark, as part of normal life.
Loving the child. Expressing the love, small gestures every once in a while. If there is love, it is going to be manifested as care, and as certain other acts.
If everything that could be done, -that should be done, is done, then the probability of the right kind of a character developing in the young person is greatly increased. And at least the parents would be able to tell themselves.. we tried the best.
This is said not to boost morale; but this author genuinely feels that if say, a hundred parents are doing all the right things, with sincerity, with heart, then most of their children would develop to be acceptable or reasonably good kind of persons. And almost all of the children would develop to be much better than what they would have been without the right kind of upbringing.
___
That would also make for a much better society.
___
B72d
Let a girl (or a boy) be bright, cheerful, but it is to be wished – her parents and spouse should also wish – she read books, -she were a constitutionally thoughtful person. Considerate to her fellow-beings, a gentle soul, a sensitive mind, not just delicate in appearance and mannerisms, considerate towards her near and dear ones, kith and kin, Helping.
That she be caring about moral and ‘substantial’ issues. ‘Larger’ matters.
In other words, a good person. A right kind of character.
This is beautiful. Something of value. This is what the aim should be, what to strive for.
For the nth time, let it be stated that all the above ideas apply to young men equally.
It’s just that the Category Blue (or ‘C-Blue’) i.e. the ‘highly educated’, professional class, the gentry class, is in the present time, going through a critical, extremely, serious problem, one major cause of which is specifically certain wrong or erroneous conduct in many/most women, and not so much men. That’s what. Many/most young men have very negative qualities specific to their group. That’s for another file.
___
B72e
Pampering or the injudicious, imprudent coddling or favouritism of society and parents toward a young woman or wife does not help, but hinders the cause of a good family and society. This happens very commonly in the ‘educated’ and financially well-off class in India and other parts of the world at present.
It does not aid but severely hampers the development of the girl into a principled, responsible, ‘feeling’ young woman.
[Of course, in India in the past, and at present too, in many cases (mostly in less educated, non-urban or ‘backward’ milieu), it is the opposite that happens. Boys and young men receive more care, attention and indulgence, and even the bearing of career-related expenses by parent/s is more for them. But this is at present a much less significant and receding trend].
____
It is very difficult or impossible for elders who themselves do not have culture or gentry qualities in them, to somehow bring about the development of a young person who has these qualities. -Of these qualities in their child. Of course in most cases, the desire itself would not be there.
B72f
With respect, in the present times, but not 50 years ago, in many urban, middle- and high-income group homes in India, and perhaps the West too, where the parents have had reasonable formal schooling, daughters are treated or brought up in a ‘strange’ way.
Their safety, material needs, wishes and demands are catered to, elaborate birthday parties, smothering with attention, treats, outings etc. are arranged, but there is little in the way of good teachings. Sushiksha.
-Her duties in life. It is as if the parents forget the part about imparting good influences and values in them.
Probably boys are not taught principles in such homes either. But the present prevalent system is such that young men have to bear certain responsibilities in life, or it is they who land in trouble. Their employers, the society, potential spouses or spouse do not spare them.
___
B33b
Men should of course choose only on the basis of good-heartedness, sincere commitment to a marriage relationship, moral condition, intelligence, culture in a woman while prospecting/match-making, and nothing else. (i.e. aesthetics of the appearance should not be a criterion. Nor is ‘cheerfulness’, ‘smartness’, being ‘bright’ and vivacious/‘outgoing’, or being delicate, manifestly ‘feminine’).
(Practically, medical fitness i.e. the ability to start a family is an essential consideration).
___
B24b
Over the past 50 years or so, and in a rampant form now, there is the phenomenon of relatively worthy persons or members of certain socio-cultural groups which have many good and uncommon (‘rare’) qualities, – not having children or marrying outside of their socio-cultural group and outside of any closely related group.
-this is said with all respect and love for the above persons.
-Or making wrong choices of spouse. Often simplistically and massively wrong choices. According to the observations of this author, probably, as a matter of fact, such wrong choices are being made much more by the women than by the men.
The scale and nature of the above phenomena has been such that it has resulted in what can be called The Great Extinction (in process; heading toward-) or The Great Destruction or The Great Loss of Good Things. The last two HAVE ALREADY HAPPENED. Let us not allow it to worsen. Let us rejuvenate and restore.
It takes centuries to build a civilization. – A good, valuable society and culture. It takes but one generation to destroy it.
A2c
The decision of which person to marry and how to lead one’s married life, should be based not on the Entertainment Principle. -Or the Comfort Principle. –But on the Virtue Principle.
One may remember the role played by Mm. Wahida Rehman in the film Mashaal.
When the hero says, genuinely rueful of how he has not been able to provide to his wife a comfortable material life : “What kind of a man did you marry?” (“Tumne bhi kaise admi se shadi kar liya?”),
-The wife – not raising her head from her chore – replies with dignity, serenity but satirically – “True, what kind of a man did I marry?” (“Han, maine bhi kaise admi se shadi kar liya.”).
The man in question was not at all ‘worthless’. He was idealistic, hard-working and of moral courage.
*
Post script :
Regarding ‘dating’ : Such kind of a thing can also be done with dignity, with some right intentions. But on the whole it is avoidable.
Many couples I have seen and liked, respected, were married through this route. And as has been said in this Paper, ‘self-affected’ marriages are alright. It’s just that the ‘dating’ practice should be avoided. Meeting – of the two persons only – a few times – to get to know each other – to consider marriage better – is fine, indeed necessary. But not for general entertainment, as a leisure activity.
And naturally the conversation or talk there wouldn’t be of the ‘romantic’ kind. And of course ‘display of affection’ should be unthinkable. There should be no holding of hands, or hands over the shoulders etc.